Comparative Evaluation of Effects of Propofol and Ketamine versus Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine on Blood Pressure, Heart Rate and Recovery of Patients undergoing Dilatation and Curettage
Effects of Propofol and Ketamine versus Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine in Patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v5i07.1626Keywords:
Propofol, Ketamine, Dexmedetomidine, Dilatation, CurettageAbstract
Cardiovascular stability and fast recovery are fundamentals of anesthesia for day care surgery. Dilatation and curettage is a commonly performed minor surgery in obstetrics and gynecology. Propofol is well-studied agent in short surgical procedures. Dexmedetomidine, popular for conscious and cooperative sedation is being used for minor gynecological procedures nowadays. Objective: To compare the effects of propofol and ketamine combination with dexmedetomidine and ketamine combination on cardiovascular parameters and recovery of patients undergoing dilatation and curettage. Methods: In a quasi-experimental study from March 2021 to August 2021, 136 patients admitted for dilatation and curettage under anesthesia were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups. Group P+K received intravenous propofol and ketamine and Group D+K received intravenous dexmedetomidine and ketamine. During the procedure, blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and recovery time were noted in both groups. Results: The demographic data were comparable in both groups. Group P+K had significantly higher heart rate at 5, 10, 15 min, and at the ending of the procedure as compared to group D+K. Group D+K had significantly higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure at 2 min, 5 min, 10 min, 15 min and at procedure end in comparison with group P+K. Bradycardia was observed in 62 (91.2%) patients in D+K group whereas, in P+K group, hypotension was observed in 16 (23.5%) patients. The mean time to attain MAS (modified aldrete score) of 10 in group P+K was 32.0 ± 2.1 minutes whereas in group D+K was 41.3 ± 2.6 minutes. Conclusions: It was concluded that the use of dexmedetomidine and ketamine in dilatational and curettage provides cardiovascular stability without respiratory depression as compared to propofol and ketamine.
References
Yousefian M, Erdi AM, Haghshenas N. A Comparative Study on the Effects of Ketofol, Dexmedetomidine, and Isofol in Anesthesia of Candidates for Dilatation and Curettage. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. 2021 Dec; 11(6). doi: 10.5812/aapm.121527.
Swaroop VP, Subhashini PK, Nuthangi R, Kambar C, Ramana VV, Rajasulochana P. Day care anaesthesia with Ketamine v/s Fentanyl a comparative study-in short surgical procedures. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2015 Aug; 14(8): 10-18.
Sethi P, Sindhi S, Verma A, Tulsiani KL. Dexmedetomidine versus propofol in dilatation and curettage: An open-label pilot randomized controlled trial. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2015 Jul; 9(3): 258-62. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.154699.
Tomar GS, Singh F, Ganguly S, Gaur N. Is dexmedetomidine better than propofol and fentanyl combination in minor day care procedures? A prospective randomised double-blind study. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2015 Jun; 59(6): 359-64. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.158740.
Amer AM, Youssef AM, El-Ozairy HS, El-Hennawy AM. Propofol‐cetamina versus dexmedetomidina‐cetamina para sedação durante endoscopia digestiva alta em pacientes pediátricos: estudo clínico randomizado. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia. 2021 Feb; 70: 620-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2020.08.005.
Yamanaka T and Sadikot RT. Opioid effect on lungs. Respirology. 2013 Feb; 18(2): 255-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2012.02307.x.
Wu Y, Zhang Y, Hu X, Qian C, Zhou Y, Xie J. A comparison of propofol vs. dexmedetomidine for sedation, haemodynamic control and satisfaction, during esophagogastroduodenoscopy under conscious sedation. Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics. 2015 Aug; 40(4): 419-25. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12282.
Ahuja H, Abraham V, Abraham J, Liddle D. Ideal anesthetic agents for day-care gynecological procedures: A clinical trial comparing thiopentone with ketamine as adjuncts to propofol. Advanced Biomedical Research. 2015 Jan; 4(1): 81. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.156639.
Techanivate A, Verawattaganon T, Saiyuenyong C, Areeruk P. A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus propofol on hypotension during colonoscopy under sedation. Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research. 2012 Nov; 3(11). doi: 10.4172/2155-6148.1000257.
Ali RM, Ismail AE, Hanna BE. Comparative evaluation of hemodynamic stability and recovery during conscious sedation by dexmedetomidine with fentanyl versus ketamine with fentanyl in dilatation and curettage. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2018 Oct; 73(2): 5992-7. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2018.12367.
Anand VG. Sedation in intensive care unit: Is Dexmedetomidine the best choice? International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science. 2012 Jan; 2(1): 3-5. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.94866.
Chrysostomou C and Schmitt CG. Dexmedetomidine: sedation, analgesia and beyond. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology. 2008 May; 4(5): 619-27. doi: 10.1517/17425255.4.5.619.
Sethi P, Mohammed S, Bhatia PK, Gupta N. Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for conscious sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: An open-label randomised controlled trial. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2014 Jan; 58(1): 18-24. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.126782.
Azizkhani R, Kouhestani S, Heydari F, Esmailian M, Feizi A, Gourtani BK et al. Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol in reducing recovery agitation in pediatric patients after ketamine procedural sedation in emergency department. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2021 Jan; 26(1): 61
Gertler R, Brown HC, Mitchell DH, Silvius EN. Dexmedetomidine: a novel sedative-analgesic agent. InBaylor University Medical Center Proceedings. Taylor & Francis. 2001 Jan; 14(1): 13-21. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2001.11927725.
Tobias JD. Dexmedetomidine and ketamine: an effective alternative for procedural sedation?. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2012 Jul; 13(4): 423-7. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e318238b81c.
Kim JC, Kim J, Kwak H, Ahn SW. Premedication with dexmedetomidine to reduce emergence agitation: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiology. 2019 Dec; 19(144): 1-6. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0816-5.
Darwish A, Samir RS, Hefzi O. A Comparative Study: Dexmedetomidine/Ketamine versus Propofol/Ketamine Combination for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Dacrocystorhinostomy (DCR) Surgery under Local Anesthesia. Life Science Journal. 2013; 3: 10.
Joshi VS, Kollu SS, Sharma RM. Comparison of dexmedetomidine and ketamine versus propofol and ketamine for procedural sedation in children undergoing minor cardiac procedures in cardiac catheterization laboratory. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia. 2017 Oct; 20(4): 422-6. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_16_17.
Farrukh R, Awan WS, Khan AH, Rana AR, Jilani AA, Mahmood K. Comparison of dexmeditomidine and propofol for hemodynamic and recovery characteristics in dilatation and curettage. The Professional Medical Journal. 2020 Jun; 27(06): 1244-8. doi: 10.29309/TPMJ/2020.27.06.4216.
Benken S, Madrzyk E, Chen D, Lopez J, Schmelzer D, Sessions Z et al. Hemodynamic effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine in septic patients without shock. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2020 Jun; 54(6): 533-40. doi: 10.1177/1060028019895502.
Canpolat DG, Yildirim MD, Kutuk N, DOĞRUEL F, Ocak H, Aksu R et al. Comparison of ketamine-propofol and ketamine-dexmedetomidine combinations in children for sedation during tooth extraction. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2017 May; 67(5): 693-697.
Kandil A, Subramanyam R, Hossain MM, Ishman S, Shott S, Tewari A et al. Comparison of the combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine to propofol or propofol/sevoflurane for drug‐induced sleep endoscopy in children. Pediatric Anesthesia. 2016 Jul; 26(7): 742-51. doi: 10.1111/pan.12931.
Algharabawy WS, Abusinna RG, AbdElrahman TN. Dexmedetomidine-ketamine versus propofol-ketamine for sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in hepatic patients (a comparative randomized study). Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2021 Jan; 37(1): 364-72. doi: 10.1080/11101849.2021.1961428.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For comments