Impact of Induction Timing on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Term and Late Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: A Prospective Observational Study

Induction Timing and Outcomes in Term and Late Preterm PROM

Authors

  • Nargis Fatima Department of Gynecology, Combine Military Hospital Malir, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Samia Nasreen Department of Gynecology, Combine Military Hospital Malir, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Nasreen Hassan Department of Gynecology, Combine Military Hospital Malir, Karachi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v7i9.4033

Keywords:

Pre-Labour Rupture of Membranes, Labour Induction, Late Preterm, Neonatal Outcomes, Chorioamnionitis, Neonatal Sepsis

Abstract

Prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) is a significant obstetric complication predisposing a woman to chorioamnionitis, neonatal sepsis, and placental abruption. The optimal timing of labour induction, particularly in late preterm pregnancies, remains a clinical challenge requiring a balance between infectious risk and prematurity-related morbidity. Objectives:  To evaluate the association between early versus late induction of labour and maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with term and late preterm PROM. Methods: This prospective study was conducted at the Combined Military Hospital, Malir, from October 2023 to September 2024. A total of 111 women with singleton pregnancies ≥34 weeks with confirmed PROM were grouped as term (≥37 weeks) or late preterm (34–36+6 weeks) and stratified by induction timing: early (6–12 hours) or late (>12 hours). Maternal and neonatal outcomes were analyzed using SPSS version 27.0, with Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests applied; p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: Of 111 participants, term PROM was present in 59 (53.2%) and late preterm PROM in 52 (46.8%); 61 (55.0%) underwent early and 50 (45.0%) late induction. Spontaneous vaginal delivery was the predominant mode (63.1%). Late preterm PROM was associated with significantly worse neonatal outcomes than term PROM across all parameters, while induction timing had no significant effect on any maternal or neonatal outcome. Conclusions: Gestational age at membrane rupture is a stronger determinant of neonatal morbidity than induction timing. Thus, we cannot claim that early induction is definitively 'safe'—only that it was not associated with worse outcomes in this specific cohort.

References

Bachar G, Shemesh D, Farago N, Siegler Y, Khatib N, Ginsberg Y et al. The optimal induction timing in prelabor rupture of membranes: a retrospective study. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2023 Dec; 36(1): 2215997. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2215997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2023.2215997

Jiang Y, Zhang Y, Li Y, Zhao K, Zhao Y, Che Y. Determinants for Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Prospective Cohort Study. BioMed Central Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2025 May; 25(1): 633. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07748-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07748-0

Hagen ID, Bailey JM, Zielinski RE. Outcomes of Expectant Management of Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing. 2021 Mar; 50(2): 122-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2020.10.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2020.10.010

Telayneh AT, Ketema DB, Mengist B, Yismaw L, Bazezew Y, Birhanu MY et al. Pre-Labor Rupture of Membranes and Associated Factors Among Pregnant Women Admitted to the Maternity Ward, Northwest Ethiopia. PLOS global public health. 2023 Mar; 3(3): 1702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001702

Tano S, Ueno T, Mayama M, Yamada T, Takeda T, Uno K et al. Relationship between vaginal group B streptococcus colonization in the early stage of pregnancy and preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2021 Feb; 21(1): 141. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03624-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03624-9

Mu Y, Hu A, Kan H, Li Y, He Y, Fan W et al. Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes Linked to Vaginal Bacteriome of Pregnant Females in the Early Second Trimester: A Case-Cohort Design. Reproductive Sciences. 2023 Jul; 30(7): 2324-2335. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-01153-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-022-01153-0

Monari F, Chiossi G, Ballarini M, Menichini D, Gargano G, Coscia A et al. Perinatal Outcomes in Twin Late Preterm Pregnancies: Results from an Italian Area-Based, Prospective Cohort Study. Italian Journal of Pediatrics. 2022 Jun; 48(1): 101. doi: 10.1186/s13052-022-01297-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-022-01297-4

Alansari B, Almiraisi H, Alani R, Abozenah Y, Ghorabah M. Immediate Induction Versus Expectant Management in Term Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Longitudinal Analysis of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes. Cureus. 2025 Jul; 17(7): 87640. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.87640

Puhl A, Weiss C, Schneid A, Zahn E, Kraft K, Pretscher J et al. Erhöht die Geburtseinleitung wegen eines frühen vorzeitigen Blasensprungs ab 34+ 0 SSW das Risiko für einen Kaiserschnitt? Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie. 2020 Oct; 224(5): 269-274. doi: 10.1055/a-1110-1132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1110-1132

Thabet A, Dajenah M, Ahmed F, Ghabisha S, Dajenah Z, Al-Hagri A, Badheeb M. Induction of Labor Outcomes: Insights from a Single-Center Experience from Yemen. Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care. 2025 Feb; 2025(1): 3. doi: 10.5339/jemtac.2025.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5339/jemtac.2025.3

Awkadigwe FI, Ezugwu FO, Eleje GU, Nweze SO, Odugu BU, Dinwoke VO et al. Active Versus Expectant Management for Premature Rupture of Membranes at Term: A Randomized, Controlled Study. Journal of International Medical Research. 2023 Aug; 51(8): 03000605231195451. doi: 10.1177/03000605231195451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605231195451

Schmidt EM, Powell JM, Garg B, Caughey AB. Association Between Gestational Age and Perinatal Outcomes in Women with Late Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes. American Journal of Perinatology. 2024 Dec; 41(16): 2312-4. doi: 10.1055/a-2328-6192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2328-6192

Suleiman BK, Bello OO, Tijani AM, Oluwasola TA. Management Outcome of Premature Rupture of Membranes in a Tertiary Health Facility in South Western Nigeria. Annals of Ibadan Postgraduate Medicine. 2021; 19(1): 63-9.

Chiossi G, Di Tommaso M, Monari F, Consonni S, Strambi N, Zoccoli SG et al. Neonatal Outcomes and Risk of Neonatal Sepsis in an Expectantly Managed Cohort of Late Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2021 Jun; 261: 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.03.036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.03.036

Abu Shqara R, Rosso L, Lowensetin L, Frank Wolf M. Maternal and Perinatal Infectious Morbidity in Term Prelabor Rupture of Membrane According to Two Induction of Labor Protocols. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2024 Sep; 310(3): 1577-85. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07624-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07624-w

Yuan L, Sun G, Guan P, Chen J, Leng B, Cao D. Use of vaginal dinoprostone for women with term prelabor rupture of membranes and an unfavorable cervix within 6 h versus within 6–24 h. BioMed Central Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2024 Aug; 24(1): 548. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06760-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06760-0

Bitenc M, Ovsenik L, Lučovnik M, Verdenik I, Kornhauser Cerar L. Association Between Latency Period and Perinatal Outcomes After Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes at 32–37 Weeks of Gestation: A Perinatal Registry-Based Cohort Study. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2022 Jan; 50(1): 18-24. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2021-0082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2021-0082

Lee D and Lynch TA. PPROM in the Late Preterm Period: An Argument for Expectant Management. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology MFM. 2025 Mar; 7(1): 101563. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101563

Bitar G and Sibai BM. Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes in the Late Preterm Period: An Argument Against Expectant Management. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology MFM. 2025 Mar; 7(1): 101619. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101619

Simons NE, de Ruigh AA, van’t Hooft J, Aarnoudse-Moens CS, van Wely M, van der Ham DP et al. Childhood Outcomes After Induction of Labor or Expectant Management for Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: A 10-Year Follow-Up of the PPROMEXIL Trials. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2023 May; 228(5): 588-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.02.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.02.007

Ramirez-Montesinos L, Downe S, Ramsden A. Systematic Review on the Management of Term Prelabour Rupture of Membranes. BioMed Central Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2023 Sep; 23(1): 650. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05878-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05878-x

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30
Check for updates
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v7i9.4033
Published: 2026-09-30

How to Cite

Fatima, N., Nasreen, S., & Hassan, N. (2026). Impact of Induction Timing on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Term and Late Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: A Prospective Observational Study: Induction Timing and Outcomes in Term and Late Preterm PROM. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 7(9), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v7i9.4033

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit

Most read articles by the same author(s)