Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite and Glutaraldehyde on Hardness of Calcium Sulphate Hemihydrate: Sodium Hypochlorite and Glutaraldehyde on Hardness of Calcium Sulphate Hemihydrate

Mahrukh Abbas; Irfan Ahmed Shaikh; Abdul Bari Memon; . Permanand; Muhammad Ahmed; Usman Bashir Shaikh; Ghazanfar Ali Bhellar

doi:10.54393/pjhs.v5i08.1091

Authors

Mahrukh Abbas Department of Prosthodontics, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan
Irfan Ahmed Shaikh Department of Prosthodontics, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan
Abdul Bari Memon Department of Community Dentistry, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical University, Larkana Pakistan
. Permanand Department of Operative Dentistry, Bhittai Dental and Medical College, Mirpurkhas, Pakistan
Muhammad Ahmed Department of Operative Dentistry, Liaquat College of Medicine and Dentistry, Karachi, Pakistan
Usman Bashir Shaikh Department of Prosthodontics, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan
Ghazanfar Ali Bhellar Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bibi Aseefa Dental College, Larkana, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v5i08.1091

Keywords:

Hardness, Calcium Sulphate Hemihydrate, Sodium Hypochlorite, Glutaraldehyde Solutions

Abstract

Calcium sulphate hemihydrate (CSH) is extensively used in dentistry for impressions, models, and casts due to its versatility. However, exposure to disinfectants like sodium hypochlorite and glutaraldehyde, commonly used in dental practices, can potentially alter CSH's mechanical properties. Objective: To measure the hardness of calcium sulphate hemihydrate cast after repeated immersion in sodium hypochlorite and glutaraldehyde solutions. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Dentistry LUMHS, Jamshoro and the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro. Test groups were divided into three groups i.e. Control group, Sodium hypochlorite (0.525%) and Glutaraldehyde (2%). Descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: Mean hardness in Group A was 8.94 ± 0.40, 8.40 ± 0.47 in Group B and 8.02 ± 0.59 in Group C. The mean hardness at the load of 10 kg in Group A, Group B and Group C was 7.01 ± 0.05, 7.31 ± 0.25, and 7.06 ± 0.04 respectively. Mean hardness at a secondary load of 60 kg in Group A, Group B and Group C was 6.95 ± 1.21, 7.48 ± 0.24 and 7.24 ± 0.05 respectively. The results showed a significant mean difference for mean hardness (p = 0.000), hardness at the load of 10 kg (p = 0.000) and hardness at the secondary load of 60 kg (p = 0.036). Conclusion: It was concluded that mean hardness was more in sodium hypochlorite group than control group and glutaraldehyde group

References

Puttaiah R, Bedi R, Almas K. A survey of infection control practices among general dental practitioners in Lahore, Pakistan. Journal of The Pakistan Dental Association. 2001; 10(2): 71-6. doi:

Mansfield SM and White JM. Antimicrobial effects from the incorporation of disinfectants into gypsum casts. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1991 Mar; 4(2): 180. doi:

Bhat VS, Shetty MS, Shenoy KK. Infection control in the prosthodontic laboratory. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2007 Apr; 7(2): 62-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.33997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.33997

Moslehifard E, Nasirpouri F, Gasemzadeh S. Effect of disinfectants on the hardness of dental stones. Journal of Iranian Dental Association. 2013 Jul; 25(3): 183-9. doi:

Hamad FS. Infection control in dentistry: a review. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research. 2023 Apr; 11(4): 111-7. doi: 10.21276/jamdsr. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21276/jamdsr

Malaviya N and Shrestha A. Comparative Evaluation of Surface Detail Changes and Compressive Strength of Gypsum Casts and Dies After Immersion in Hypochlorite Solution and Microwave Irradiation-An in Vitro Study. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research. 2016; 3(6): 1547-51. doi:

Abdullah MA. Surface detail, compressive strength, and dimensional accuracy of gypsum casts after repeated immersion in hypochlorite solution. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2006 Jun; 95(6): 462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.019

Shultz J. Limitations of Sodium Hypochlorite as a Disinfectant. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2007; 4(49): B76. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.02.216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.02.216

Egusa H, Watamoto T, Abe K, Kobayashi M, Kaneda Y, Ashida S et al. An analysis of the persistent presence of opportunistic pathogens on patient-derived dental impressions and gypsum casts. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2008 Jan; 21(1): 62. doi:

Fernandes AK, Bhat V, Bhat M, Shetty S, Kutty SM, Malik A. A comparative study of the effect of different disinfectant solutions on the compressive strength of type III gypsum. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences. 2020 Aug; 12(Suppl 1): S530-7. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_151_20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_151_20

Nainggolan CF and Putranti DT. The effects of mixing slurry water with type III gypsum on setting time, compressive strength and dimensional stability. Majalah Kedokteran Gigi. 2021 Dec; 54(4): 195-9. doi: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v54.i4.p195-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v54.i4.p195-199

Niekawa CT, Kreve S, A'vila GB, Godoy GG, da Silva JE, Dias SC. Analysis of the mechanical behavior and surface rugosity of different dental die materials. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry. 2017 Jan; 7(1): 34-40. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.200706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.200706

Kumar immersion of gypsum cast in sodium hypochlorite and glutaraldehyde on its physical properties: An: in vitro: study. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences. 2012 Aug; 4(Suppl RN, Reddy SM, Karthigeyan S, Punithavathy R, Karthik KS, Manikandan R. The effect of repeated 2): S353-7. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.100270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.100270

Naylor WP. Infection control in fixed prosthodontics. Dental Clinics of North America. 1992 Jul; 36(3): 809-31. doi: 10.1016/S0011-8532(22)01830-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-8532(22)01830-4

Neppala G, Ahmed N, Ganapathy D. Influence of steam under pressure sterilization on the dimensional stability of implant impressions. Journal of Coastal Life Medicine. 2022 Aug; 10: 332-8. doi:

Abdelaziz KM, Combe EC, Hodges JS. The effect of disinfectants on the properties of dental gypsum, part 2: surface properties. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2002 Dec; 11(4): 234-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2002.00234.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2002.00234.x

Muzaffar D, Choudhary S, Jameel RA, Afaq A, Tanwir F, Hashmi S. A practical guide to use and methods of disinfection of Alginate impression materials. EC Dental Science. 2015 Dec; 3(3): 515-26. doi:

Hussain SM, Tredwin CJ, Nesbit M, Moles DR. The effect of disinfection on irreversible hydrocolloid and type III gypsum casts. The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2006 Jun; 14(2): 50-4. doi:

Sanad ME, Combe EC, Grant AA. The use of additives to improve the mechanical properties of gypsum products. Journal of Dental Research. 1982 Jun; 61(6): 808-10. doi: 10.1177/00220345820610063201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610063201

Craig RG and Powers JM. Gypsum products and investments. Restorative Dental Materials. 1997; 10: 333-60. doi:

Mostafavi A, Koosha S, Amjad M. Effect of Disinfection on the Surface Roughness of Dental Casts Retrieved from Addition Silicone Impressions. Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences. 2018 Feb; 3(1): 27-33. doi: 10.29252/jrdms.3.1.27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29252/jrdms.3.1.27

Owall B and Nilner K. Detail reproduction with alginates and dental stones. Odontologisk Revy. 1973 Jan; 24(2): 173-82. doi:

Henry RW and Phillips RW. Influence of particle size of stone on surface detail of casts. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1961 Jan; 11(1): 169-73. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(61)90123-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(61)90123-8

Drennon DG and Johnson GH. The effect of immersion disinfection of elastomeric impressions on the surface detail reproduction of improved gypsum casts. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1990 Feb; 63(2): 233-41. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90111-O. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90111-O

Abdelaziz KM, Combe EC, Hodges JS. The effect of disinfectants on the properties of dental gypsum: 1. Mechanical properties. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2002 Sep; 11(3): 161-7. doi: 10.1053/jopr.2002.126860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jopr.2002.126860

Lucas MG, Arioli‐Filho JN, Nogueira SS, Batista AU, Pereira RD. Effect of incorporation of disinfectant solutions on setting time, linear dimensional stability, and detail reproduction in dental stone casts. Journal of Prosthodontics: Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry. 2009 Aug; 18(6): 521-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00466.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00466.x

Ferreira AR, Nagem Filho H, Pinto JH. Determinação da magnitude de expansão de alguns tipos de gesso. Salusvita. 2000 Feb; 19(2): 29-39. doi:

Tuncer N and Tufekç HB. Investigation on the compressive strength of several gypsum products dried by microwave oven with different programs. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1993 Mar 1;69(3):333-9. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90116-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90116-6

Derrien G, Le Menn G, Jendresen MD, Malone WF, Taylor TD. Evaluation of detail reproduction for three die materials by using scanning electron microscopy and two-dimensional profilometry. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1995 Jul; 74(1): 1-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80221-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80221-5