End to End Anastomotic Urethroplasty in the Management of Posterior Urethral Distraction Defect

End to End Anastomotic Urethroplasty

Authors

  • Khalid Farooq Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Ilyas Zahoor Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Awais Ahmed DHQ Hospital, Nowshera, Pakistan
  • Haris Hameed Bannu Medical College, Bannu, Pakistan
  • Najma Hameed Northwest General Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Israr Ali Khan Bannu Medical College, Bannu, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i12.1218

Keywords:

Anastomotic Urethroplasty, Urethral Distraction Defect, Blind Stricture, Optical Urethrotomy, Retrograde Urethrography

Abstract

Posterior urethral distraction deficits are a difficult and complex clinical condition that necessitates specialized care in urological therapy. End-to-end anastomotic urethroplasty has emerged as a critical procedure for treating posterior urethral distraction abnormalities, providing a thorough and successful approach for restoring normal urethral function. Objective: To assess the outcome of end-to-end urethroplasty in posterior urethral distraction defects. Methods: This study was conducted at the departments of Urology, MTI LRH, and Peshawar from 1st November 2017 to 31st December 2021. It was a descriptive case-series study by design. Patients included were having blind urethral strictures. End to end urethroplasty was performed. Patients were followed for one year. Depending upon symptoms relief, uro-flowmetery studies, and radiographic findings at the end of one year, success was defined as good, fair, or poor. Results: The study included a total of 110 patients, with a majority being male (80%) and the remaining 20% being female. The mean age of the patients was 35 years, with the majority falling in the age group of 30-39 years (50.9%). Good outcomes were recorded in 79 patients (71.8%). 11 (10.0%) participants had poor outcomes. Conclusions: Urethroplasty is a gold standard treatment modality in terms of outcome for patients with posterior urethral distraction defects.

References

Ghoniem G, Stanford E, Kenton K, Achtari C, Goldberg R, Mascarenhas T, et al. Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice. International Urogynecology Journal. 2008 Jan; 19: 5-33. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0495-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0495-5

Lazzeri M, Sansalone S, Guazzoni G, Barbagli G. Incidence, causes, and complications of urethral stricture disease. European Urology Supplements. 2016 Jan; 15(1): 2-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eursup.2015.10.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eursup.2015.10.002

Xu AJ, Mishra K, Lee YS, Zhao LC. Robotic-Assisted Lower Genitourinary Tract Reconstruction. Urologic Clinics. 2022 Aug; 49(3): 507-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2022.05.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2022.05.003

Koratim MM. Pelvic fracture urethral injuries: the unresolved controversy. The Journal of Urology. 1999 May; 161(5): 1433-41. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68918-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68918-5

Levin TL, Han B, Little BP. Congenital anomalies of the male urethra. Pediatric Radiology. 2007 Sep; 37: 851-62. doi: 10.1007/s00247-007-0495-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-007-0495-0

Horiguchi A. Management of male pelvic fracture urethral injuries: Review and current topics. International Journal of Urology. 2019 Jun; 26(6): 596-607. doi: 10.1111/iju.13947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13947

Di Grazia E, D'Arrigo L, Amuso G, Dammino S, Maira A, Russo G, et al. Subcapsular Kidney Urinoma After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. XXIV Congresso Nazionale Auro. 2017–Pisa 19/21 maggio. 2017: 274.

Hosseini J, Shahid B, Shohada T, Kaviani A. Monti’s procedure as an alternative technique in complex urethral distraction defect. International Brazilian Journal of Urology. 2010 Apr; 36(3): 317-26. doi: 10.1590/S1677-55382010000300008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382010000300008

Barbagli G, Guazzoni G, Lazzeri M. One-stage bulbar urethroplasty: retrospective analysis of the results in 375 patients. European Urology. 2008 Apr; 53(4): 828-33. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.041

Santucci RA, Mario LA, Aninch JW. Anastomotic urethroplasty for bulbar urethral stricture: analysis of 168 patients. The Journal of Urology. 2002 Apr; 167(4): 1715-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65184-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65184-1

Eltahawy EA, Virasoro R, Schlossberg SM, McCammon KA, Jordan GH. Long-term followup for excision and primary anastomosis for anterior urethral strictures. The Journal of Urology. 2007 May; 177(5): 1803-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.033

Jezior JR and Schlossberg SM. Excision and primary anastomosis for anterior urethral stricture. Urologic Clinics. 2002 May; 29(2): 373-80. doi: 10.1016/S0094-0143(02)00035-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(02)00035-6

Hussain M, Soomro RA, Hashmi A, Hussain Z, Naqvi A, Rizvi A. Urethral Stricture disease: A review of 100 cases. Pakistan Journal of Surgery. 1979; 13(117): 19.

Shaikh NA, Shaikh MN, Anwar S. Comparison of optical urethrotomy with perineal urethroplasty in the management of traumatic blind posterior urethral stricture. Pakistan Journal of Medical Research. 2005; 44(3): 117-21.

O’Riordan A, Narahari R, Kumar V, Pickard R. Outcome of dorsal buccal graft urethroplasty for recurrent bulbar urethral strictures. BJU International. 2008 Nov; 102(9): 1148-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07763.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07763.x

Berstein MR, Stolpen AH, Brodek GA. Three dimentional magnetic resonance angiography of pelvic vasculature in post-traumatic impotence. Journal of Urology. 1998; 159: 260-62.

Carlos RG, Ezequiel B, Ana MO, Ignacio T. Dorsal oral mucosa graft in combination with ventral penile flap as an alternative to repair obliterative stenosis of the anterior urethra in a single surgical time. International Brazilian Journal of Urology. 2014 Sep; 46(1): 83-9.

Fasihuddin Q, Ali SH, Kumar NA. Improvising our technique of end to end urethroplasty. Journal of Surgery Pakistan (International). 2009 Jul; 14: 3.

Levy ME and Elliott SP. Graft use in bulbar urethroplasty. Urologic Clinics. 2017 Feb; 44(1): 39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2016.08.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2016.08.009

Choudhary AK and Jha NK. Is anastomotic urethroplasty is really superior than BMG augmented dorsal onlay urethroplasty in terms of outcomes and patient satisfaction: Our 4-year experience. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2015 Jan; (1-2): E22. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.2291

Sachin D, ChikkaMoga Siddaiah M, Vilvapathy Senguttuvan K, Chandrashekar Sidaramappa R, Ramaiah K. Incidence of de novo erectile dysfunction after urethroplasty: a prospective observational study. The World Journal of Men's Health. 2017 Aug; 35(2): 94-9. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.2017.35.2.94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.2017.35.2.94

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v4i12.1218
Published: 2023-12-31

How to Cite

Farooq, K., Zahoor, I., Ahmed, A., Hameed, H., Hameed, N., & Khan, I. A. (2023). End to End Anastomotic Urethroplasty in the Management of Posterior Urethral Distraction Defect: End to End Anastomotic Urethroplasty. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 4(12), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i12.1218

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit