Comparison of Effectiveness of Conventional Polypectomy with Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Conventional Polypectomy and Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Authors

  • Asad Ullah Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Momina Zeb Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Wajih Ud Din Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Sadaf Raffat Mustafa Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Heavy Industries Taxila Education City-Institute of Medical Sciences, Taxila, Pakistan
  • Mehveen Babar Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Wah Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Minahil Arshad Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v5i08.1814

Keywords:

Nasal polyposis, Conventional Polypectomy, Microdebrider, Sinus Surgery Outcomes, Conventional Intranasal Polypectomy, Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Abstract

It is common for rhinologists to face nasal polyposis. When other treatments have failed, patients must undergo Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) with a microdebrider or traditional equipment to clear out their sinuses and restore normal airflow. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of conventional polypectomy with functional endoscopic sinus surgery in patients presenting to tertiary level care hospital in Islamabad, Pakistan. Methods: This study was conducted at Department of ENT Head and Neck Surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad from November 2017 to December 2018. Eighty-eight patients were enrolled and they were randomly into group A and group B assigned for conventional polypectomy and functional endoscopic sinus surgery, respectively. Results: There were 27 (61.4%) males and 17 (38.6%) females and mean age was 34.59 ± 12.00 years in conventional polypectomy and 28 (63.6%) males and 16 (36.5%) females and mean age was 36.64 ± 10.76 years in function endoscopic sinus surgery. The recurrence rate after 6 months in patients underwent conventional polypectomy was 18 (40.9%) and functional endoscopic sinus surgery was 2 (4.5%). Conclusion: The frequency of recurrence of nasal polyps after conventional polypectomy was more than in patients receiving functional endoscopic sinus surgery procedure.

References

Varman K, Viswanatha B, Hussain M, Vijayashree MS, Killera S. Conventional versus Microdebrider Assisted Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Sinonasal Polyposis-A Comparative Study. Research in Otolaryngology. 2017 Mar; 6(1): 10-5. doi: 10.5923/j.otolaryn.20170601.03.

Ghera B, Munjal M, Chopra H. Comparative study of conventional versus microdebrider assisted endoscopic sinus surgery in sinonasal polyposis. International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. 2016 Oct; 2(4): 197-204. doi: 10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20162226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20162226

Singla P, Gulati A, Singh S, Malik P. To compare the results of endoscopic sinus surgery with and without microdebrider in patients of nasal polyposis. An International Journal Clinical Rhinology. 2014 Aug; 7(2): 61-3. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10013-1196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10013-1196

Rizvi SS, Chaudhry S, Ahmad Z, Akbar A, Jabeen F, Khalil N. Recurrence of nasal polyp (s) in patients undergoing Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery and conventional intranasal polypectomy. Rawal Medical Journal. 2021 Jul;46(3): 550-553.

Aljfout Q, Hesham R, Maita A, Saraireh M. Lund - Mackay staging for rhinosinusitis, correlation between computed tomography scan score and intraoperative findings. International Journal of Medical Research and Review. 2018; 4: 368-71. doi.org/10.17511/ijmrr.2016.i03.14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17511/ijmrr.2016.i03.14

Saba ES, Hoerter J, Chang J, Chou DW, Xiao C, Eide JG et al. Microdebrider complications in sinus surgery: Analysis of the openFDA database. World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2023 Dec; 9(04): 328-32. doi: 10.1002/wjo2.89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.89

Gohar MS, Niazi SA, Niazi SB. Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery as a primary modality of treatment for primary and recurrent nasal polyposis. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2017 Mar; 33(2): 380. doi: 10.12669/pjms.332.11800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.332.11800

Andrews PJ, Poirrier AL, Lund VJ, Choi D. Outcomes in endoscopic sinus surgery: olfaction, nose scale and quality of life in a prospective cohort study. Clinical Otolaryngology. 2016 Dec; 41(6): 798-803. doi: 10.1111/coa.12665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12665

Chen CT and Chen YR. Endoscopically assisted repair of orbital floor fractures. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2001 Dec; 108(7): 2011-8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200112000-00027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200112000-00027

Sharma B, Pokharel A, Bhandari C, Upadhyay HP. Comparative Study Between Conventional Polypectomy With Microdebrider Assisted Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. International Journal of Silkroad Institute of Research and Training. 2023 Dec; 1(2): 59-66. doi: 10.3126/ijsirt.v1i2.61401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/ijsirt.v1i2.61401

Galletti C, Barbieri MA, Ciodaro F, Freni F, Galletti F, Spina E et al. Effectiveness and safety profile of dupilumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: real-life data in tertiary care. Pharmaceuticals. 2023 Apr; 16(4): 630. doi: 10.3390/ph16040630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16040630

Zong H and Lou Z. Comparison of conventional and extended middle meatal antrostomy for the treatment of antrochoanal polyps. BioMed Central Surgery. 2023 Jan; 23(1): 16. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-01918-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01918-7

Kim C, Han J, Wu T, Bachert C, Fokkens W, Hellings P et al. Role of biologics in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: state of the art review. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2021 Jan; 164(1): 57-66. doi: 10.1177/0194599820939964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820939964

Landsberg R, Masalha M, Margulis A, Rosman Y, Schneider S. Endoscopic inferior meatal antrostomy for antrochoanal polyps: a long-term follow-up. ORL. 2022 Nov; 84(4): 336-41. doi: 10.1159/000518279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000518279

Choudhury N, Hariri A, Saleh H, Sandison A. Diagnostic challenges of antrochoanal polyps: A review of sixty‐one cases. Clinical Otolaryngology. 2018 Apr; 43(2). doi: 10.1111/coa.12993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12993

Hammouda Y, Berrada O, Rouadi S, Abada RL, Mahtar M. Treatment and evaluation of recurrence for antrochoanal polyps by endoscopic large middle meatal antrostomy, clinical case series of 25 patients. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 2020 Jan; 77: 651-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.11.104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.11.104

Mantilla E, Villamor P, De La Torre C, Álvarez-Neri H. Combined approach for paediatric recurrent antrochoanal polyp: a single-centre case series of 27 children. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 2019 Jul; 133(7): 627-31. doi: 10.1017/S0022215119000938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215119000938

Al-Balas HI, Farneti P, Bellusci A, Crocetta FM, Sollini G, Pasquini E. A comparison of two endoscopic techniques for the treatment of antrochoanal polyps. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica. 2020 Aug; 40(4): 290. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N0259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N0259

Galluzzi F, Pignataro L, Maddalone M, Garavello W. Recurrences of surgery for antrochoanal polyps in children: a systematic review. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2018 Mar; 106: 26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.12.035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.12.035

Calus L, Van Bruaene N, Bosteels C, Dejonckheere S, Van Zele T, Holtappels G et al. Twelve‐year follow‐up study after endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Clinical and Translational Allergy. 2019 Jun; 9(1): 30. doi: 10.1186/s13601-019-0269-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13601-019-0269-4

Dadgarnia M, Rahmani A, Baradaranfar M, Atighechi S, Zand V, Meybodian M et al. The relationship between endoscopic and radiologic findings and olfactory status of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps before and after the endoscopic sinus surgery. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2019 Feb; 276: 397-400. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5221-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5221-z

Lee JY and Lee SW. Preventing lateral synechia formation after endoscopic sinus surgery with a silastic sheet. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery. 2007 Aug; 133(8): 776-9. doi: 10.1001/archotol.133.8.776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.133.8.776

Downloads

Published

2024-08-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v5i08.1814
Published: 2024-08-31

How to Cite

Ullah, A., Zeb, M., Din, W. U., Mustafa, S. R., Babar, M., & Arshad, M. (2024). Comparison of Effectiveness of Conventional Polypectomy with Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Conventional Polypectomy and Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 5(08), 248–252. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v5i08.1814

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit

Most read articles by the same author(s)