Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis of the Correlation Between Gingival Biotype and Schneiderian Membrane
CBCT: Gingival Biotype and Schneiderian Membrane
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v7i6.3866Keywords:
Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Gingival Biotype, Gingival Thickness, Schneiderian Membrane, Maxillary SinusAbstract
The Schneiderian membrane plays a critical role in maxillary sinus health and implant planning. Although odontogenic and periodontal factors are known to influence membrane thickening, the role of the gingival phenotype remains unclear. Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between gingival biotype, gingival thickness, and Schneiderian membrane thickness and pathology using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods:
This analytical cross-sectional study included 96 CBCT scans obtained from Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Karachi. Gingival thickness was measured radiographically and classified as thin or thick biotype. Schneiderian membrane thickness was measured at corresponding posterior maxillary sites and categorized as normal (≤2 mm) or thickened (>2 mm). Sinus pathology was recorded. Independent-samples t-test, chi-square test, and Pearson correlation were applied (p<0.005). Results: Mean gingival thickness was 1.06 ± 0.18 mm, and mean membrane thickness was 2.23 ± 0.85 mm. Membrane thickening was observed in 61.5% of cases, while sinus pathology was present in 29.2%. No significant difference in membrane thickness was found between thin and thick biotypes (mean difference = 0.22 mm; p=0.203). Gingival biotype was not associated with membrane category (p=0.340) or sinus pathology (p=0.107). Gingival thickness showed a weak, non-significant correlation with membrane thickness (r = 0.084; p=0.416). Conclusions: Gingival phenotype was not significantly associated with Schneiderian membrane thickness or pathology. Sinus membrane alterations appear to be influenced predominantly by anatomical and odontogenic factors.
References
Takalkar S, Girotra C, Kini Y, Padhye M, Tomar G, Acharya S et al. Evaluation of Sexual Dimorphism in Schneider Membrane Thickness Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) for its Clinical and Forensic Implications. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2024 Dec; 23(6): 1528-34. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01531-2.
Al-Bahrani ZM and Al-Ghurabi ZH. Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Schneiderian Membrane Thickness. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2024 Jan; 35(1): e36-8. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009767.
Delantoni A, Şengün DN, Bayındır A, Orhan K. Risk Factors, Consequences and Treatment Alternatives of Schneiderian Membrane Perforation: Case Report and Review of the Literature. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi. 2024 Jan; 13(1): 256-63. doi: 10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1352345.
Sun S, Wang Y, Gong Z, Zhao W, Jia L, Wen Y. A comparative Study of the Application of Three Digital Imaging Techniques to Assess the Thickness of the Palatal Mucosa of the Maxillary Anterior Teeth. BioMed Central Oral Health. 2024 Sep; 24(1): 1137. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04896-1.
Cui X, Reason T, Pardi V, Wu Q, Martinez Luna AA. CBCT Analysis of Crestal Soft Tissue Thickness Before Implant Placement and Its Relationship with Cortical Bone Thickness. BioMed Central Oral Health. 2022 Dec; 22(1): 593. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02629-w.
Alalshaikh M, Tabasum A, Alotaibi N, Alesawy A, Ahmad S, Almas K et al. Risk Factors Contributing to Membrane Perforation in Lateral Window Maxillary Sinus Elevation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2025 Jun; 139(6): 642-59. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2024.12.008.
Kus-Bartoszek A, Lipski M, Jarząbek A, Manowiec J, Marek E, Droździk A. Evaluation of Gingival Phenotype in the Early Transitional Dentition Phase in Children—Comparison of Three Non-Invasive Methods. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023 Sep; 12(18): 5897. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185897.
Ibrahim M. Mucosal Phenotype as A Multidisciplinary Approach: A Narrative Review. Khalij-Libya Journal of Dental and Medical Research. 2024 Aug: 187-200. doi: 0.47705/kjdmr.248207.
Huser SM, Larson RL, Taxis TM, Almaraz JM, Reif KE, Weaver B et al. Cross-Sectional Study to Describe Bovine Leukemia Virus Herd and Within-Herd ELISA Prevalence and Bovine Leukemia Virus Proviral Load Of Convenience-Sampled Kansas Beef Cow-Calf Herds. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 2023 Feb; 84(2). doi: 10.2460/ajvr.22.09.0156.
Diaz L, Fan S, Urrutia P, Uriarte X, Fodich I, Torres A et al. Correlation Between Periodontal Phenotype and Sinus Membrane Thickness: A Systematic Review. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2023 Sep; 34(9): 881-91. doi: 10.1111/clr.14121.
Sarıbaş E, Kandemir M, Tuncer MC. Does Periodontal Bone Loss Play a Significant Role in Schneiderian Membrane Thickening? A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation. Medicina. 2025 Aug; 61(9): 1529. doi: 10.3390/medicina61091529.
Kemcha N, Andrés-Veiga M, Hurtado-Celotti D, Meniz-García C, Beca-Campoy T, Martínez-Rodríguez N. Diagnostic Assessment of Maxillary Sinus Membrane Thickening Associated with Dental Implant Perforation Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Pilot Study. Diagnostics. 2025 Nov; 15(21): 2809. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15212809.
De Souza Fernandes AC, Júnior GI, de Souza Pereira F, Galil KA, Farias IO et al. Gingival Biotype and Its Relationship with the Maxillary Membrane and Lateral Wall Thickness. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2021 Aug; 47(4): 280-6. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00247.
Javed S, Maqbool M, Warraich UM, Ullah KA, Khan ZA, Qureshi F. Relationship of Gingival Biotype with Schneiderian Membrane Thickness Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2023 Apr; 17(4). doi: 10.53350/pjmhs2023174105.
Sökmen K and Sökmen N. Evaluation of the Relationship Between Periodontal Bone Loss and Schneiderian Membrane Thickness in Upper Posterior Teeth with Root Tips Associated with the Maxillary Sinus: A Retrospective Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. BioMed Central Oral Health. 2025 Aug; 25(1): 1340. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06684-x
Saquib Abullais S, AlQahtani SM, Alqahtani S, Alaamri A, Azhar Dawasaz A, Alqahtani A et al. Radiographic Assessment of Maxillary Sinus Membrane and Lateral Wall Thickness Using Cone-Beam CT in Different Facial Types in Southwestern Saudi Arabia. Plos One. 2024 Mar; 19(3): e0298403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298403.
İspir NG, Zor ZF, Alkurt MT. Assessment of the Relationship Between Maxillary Sinus Membrane Thickness and Various Anatomical Factors Before Implant Treatment. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2024 Dec; 14(4): 1076-83. doi: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1498706.
Madfa AA, Alshammari AF, Alenezi YE, Alshammari BB, Al-Haddad A, Aledaili EA et al. Comprehensive Analysis of Maxillary Sinus Anatomical Features and Associated Characteristics: A CBCT-Based Study in a Saudi Subpopulation. BioMed Central Oral Health. 2025 Nov; 25(1): 1755. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-07152-2.
Eksi C and Seker B. Evaluating the Relationship Between Periodontal Bone Loss in Maxillary Posterior Teeth and Schneiderian Membrane Thickness. BioMed Central Oral Health. 2025 Apr; 25(1): 477. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05871-0.
AlRowis RM, Alzahrani AH, Alzuhair SH, Almalhook KA, Almasry AW, Hamdan HM et al. Assess the Association Between Periodontitis and Maxillary Sinusitis: A Cross-Sectional Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT) Study. Cureus. 2023 Nov; 15(11). doi: 10.7759/cureus.48587.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For comments



